Abstract

Purpose:
This study critically examines how governance structures of natural resources in Africa shape intergenerational equity outcomes, arguing that existing governance frameworks either reinforce inequitable patterns of resource use across generations or impose structural constraints that limit sustainable and inclusive growth. It interrogates whether governance quality can reconcile the imperative of using natural resources for current development with the obligation to protect these resources for future generations.

Design/Methodology:
Using a quantitative approach integrated with secondary data spanning multiple African countries, the study applies mathematical modeling and comparative governance indicators (including governance quality indices) to assess the empirical relationship between natural resource governance and intergenerational equity outcomes. The analysis combines econometric techniques with governance performance metrics to produce robust, mathematically grounded insights.

Findings:
Results reveal that governance quality significantly moderates the impact of natural resource exploitation on equitable intergenerational outcomes. Poor governance which is characterized by weak rule of law, corruption, and elite capture of rents correlates with unsustainable resource depletion and inequitable benefit distribution. Conversely, improvements in governance metrics align with better preservation of ecological assets and more equitable social outcomes across generations.

Originality/Value:
This research moves beyond descriptive accounts of resource governance to empirically quantify how specific governance attributes influence intergenerational equity. It contributes new evidence on the paradox of resource wealth in Africa, showing that governance, rather than resource endowment per se is the critical determinant of sustainable, equitable development over time